To be perfectly
candid, Mr. Falk, it was your son who provided that damning information, and only after
I assured him it would remain 'privileged.' Were you
actually plotting to commit a criminal act, I would be duty-bound to
inform the authorities. The fact that you have committed past crimes, if
admitted during therapy, cannot be divulged by your psychiatrist.
What if I
maintain that Rockefeller lied?
You mean you
been conducting experiments using humans as guinea pigs?
Of course not.
Rockefellerís motive for stating otherwise?
Is for me to
... and for you to
on humans, in your view then...?
immoral; human beings are sacrosanct.
conferred by God.
organism is ďlesserĒ in the eyes of the Lord Almighty.
Aphrodite; donít forget that...
... Jesus loves
No, we wouldnít
... toying with
Ask the lad for
proof, and listen to what he says if you offer...
... to pay an unofficial visit.
Odds are heíll
heís nobodyís fool.
assured youíll never set foot inside that...
Dr. Grant sits
back in his ergonomic chair, posture still erect in comparison to his patientís
(or patients'), aware he confronts a twosome, though discerning one from the other
is a difficult task, assessing
mental competence (or lack thereof) a dodgy proposition, the matter of "threat to society"
thus far ill-established, the matter of "danger to himself" none too
conclusive either. So,
whose account should be credited; the fatherís or the sonís?